If I hadn't already assigned this a blog number, I would have skipped it.
LHMP
Blog entry
It's probably a tribute to how many articles on Early Modern cross-dressing I’ve blogged that this one doesn’t seem to have said anything I find new. Which is perhaps unfair to the article, but it means these notes are going to skim a lot.
There are some historic figures where I’m almost at the point of saying, “I know there are a lot more publications about this person and their work that I haven’t read yet, but I’m not sure they’ll add value to the Project beyond what I already have.” Which isn’t to say that they might not be “better” in some absolute sense than material I’ve already covered. It’s a conundrum. Katherine Philips is on that list. (Heck—Sappho is on the list.) But I’m not quite yet at the point of moving those articles to the end of the priority list.
Lesbian Historic Motif Podcast - Episode 328 – Christina Rosetti’s “The Goblin Market” (reprised) - transcript
(Originally aired 2025/11/1)
Back when I was collecting material for a trope podcast about the theater, I added a number of articles to my shopping list that I didn't get to at the time. This (and the next) are leftovers from that list. There isn't substantially new material here for me, but the author offers more background for gender-crossing in a theatrical context in general.
This post launches a mini-grouping of articles on theatrical cross-dressing, whether at public masquerades or on stage. While reading this article I kept thinking about the use of masquerades as a dangerous liminal space in the historic romances of Georgette Heyer. Her examples sometimes post-date the masquerade era identified in this article and align solidly with the cautionary fiction of the 18th century that saw them as Not The Thing. But for a story solidly set in the early/mid 18th century, it's easy to see the possibilities of a masquerade setting for sapphic encounters.
As I mentioned in the intro to the previous post, trying to interpolate the historic realities of f/f desire in the classical era is extremely difficult. Ovid's Iphis and Ianthe is multiply distanced from the internal reality of his characters. He is a man discussing f/f desire (in a context where men were not culturally expected to have any interest in the interiority of female desire), he sets his characters in a mythic past, and he places them in a Greek setting while he himself was a product of Imperial Rome.
Trying to get at the possible experiences of female homoeroticism in Classical Rome requires a lot of interpolation from data that doesn't address that specific conjunction of identities. Here's one interesting angle.
Lesbian Historic Motif Podcast - Episode 327 - On the Shelf for November 2025 - Transcript
(Originally aired 2025/11/01)
Welcome to On the Shelf for November 2025.
As this article points out, historians of sexuality put a lot of weight on the depiction of women-loving-women in Lucian's Dialogues of the Courtesans #5, simply because of the scarcity of references to female homoeroticism in the classical era. But Lucian's fictional episode can't be read as a realistic description of anything and must be interpreted through multiple layers of context, symbolism, and cross-reference. These can make it even more valuable as a piece of data, but much more difficult to read as a mirror of historic f/f sexuality.
Pages
